Navegando por Palavra-chave "Planejamento Regional"

Agora exibindo 1 - 2 de 2
  • Imagem de Miniatura
    Item
    Arranjos institucionais e planejamento governamental: o caso dos fóruns regionais de governo no território do Vale de Aço- MG
    (Fundação João Pinheiro, 2017-03-03) Silva, Tamiris Cristhina Resende da; Cruz, Marcus Vinícius Gonçalves da; http://lattes.cnpq.br/3678172153181366; Cruz, Marcus Vinicius Gonçalves da; Carneiro, Ricardo; Silveira, Mauro César da; Ferreira, Marco Aurélio Marques
    The objective of this dissertation is to analyze how the Regional Government Forums (FRGs), implemented between 2015 and 2016 in the Government of Fernando Pimentel in the State of Minas Gerais, are presented as an institutional innovation and examine what changes have been promoted in the governmental planning process, with Introduction. For this, the concepts of governmental planning were used as theoretical support. The analytical model adopted in the dissertation is based on the one recommended by Gomide and Pires (2014) for the analysis of institutional planning arrangements. Among the main theoretical aspects of government planning is the evolution of Friedmann's approach (1987) and the current analysis of public policies, as well as aspects of governmental planning, such as Situational Strategic Planning, the Balanced Scorecard in the sector public; The Logical Framework and the ZOPP Method. A description of government planning in Minas Gerais from the 1940s onwards is also included. A qualitative, descriptive and analytical approach was adopted as a research methodology through the use of a case study in the territory of Vale do Aço as proposed by YIN (2001). For the data collection, a documentary survey was used, participation in the events of the Forums and fifteen semi-structured interviews. Among the main findings it was verified that there is a change in the initial phase of the planning cycle with the introduction of the Regional Government Forums and the territorialization of planning. In relation to the typology of participatory arrangements, the Forum can be classified as bottom up (AVRITZER, 2008). The main actors identified in this new planning system are the secretariats responsible for coordinating the Forums (SEGOV, SEPLAG, SEDPAC and SEDIF), the public servants involved and organized civil society. Regarding the technicaladministrative capacity, in the territory analyzed, the influence of the financial difficulty of the State of Minas Gerais at the time of implementation of the Forums stands out, and how organized civil society is reticent in the elaboration of the planning in this context. Regarding political capacity, the predominance of public servants was observed, followed by representatives of social movements, with low participation of business organizations in the analyzed territory. As for political capacity, the intense participation of the governor and the involvement of deputies, mayors and councilors to varying degrees were observed. It was concluded that the FRGs break with the previous technocratic logic based on the parameters of the new public management, can be institutionalized as an inducer of the popular participation in the governmental planning from the improvement of its mechanisms of execution and consolidation of the support tools through the new technologies of interaction with the citizen.
  • Imagem de Miniatura
    Item
    A ressignificação do planejamento público a partir da participação social: estudo de caso do PPA participativo da Bahia
    (Fundação João Pinheiro, 2016-03-23) Soares, Camila Montevechi; Brasil, Flávia de Paula Duque; Carneiro, Ricardo; http://lattes.cnpq.br/6739881018308220; Souza, Leticia Godinho de; http://lattes.cnpq.br/4333929511296586; Coelho, Fernando de Souza; http://lattes.cnpq.br/2038805993153668
    The origin, motivation and remarkable cycles of the public planning in Brazil revealed that it was traditionally accomplished in disagreement with democratic precepts of social inclusion and citizen participation. There was an attempt to transform planning within more democratic and formal basis, from the institutionalization of the instrument of the Multi-Annual Plan (known in Portuguese as PPA), as a bet of an affirmative transformation of planning facing to its dismantling in the 80s, contributing to improve it from a random and discretionary way to a systematic process of debate and delivery of government programming. However, some traditional legacy, constitutive dysfunctions of PPA, limitations and focus problems remained, which motivated this work to assume as necessary and desirable a resignification of planning process in the public administration, whose earnings would only be achieved if supported by new grammars relationship between the State and the society. Many of the ingredients of this resignification process of the public planning are identified in the theoretical construction of deliberative-participatory democracy. In order to confirm or refute the theoretical assumptions, this work adopts the Participatory PPA of the State of Bahia as a case of study, which is a reference in the country due to the institutional design adopted and the results achieved, relying on documentary research and interviews with the key leaders of the planning area of the government. The work presents as a central objective to demonstrate, from the adoption of three important dimensions with varieties of institutional possibilities, based on the theory of democracy, the extension of the resignification of public planning by the social participation, with reference to the intensity of democracy in the participatory institutions of Bahia’s PPA. The results report that Bahia significantly expanded social participation in the elaboration of the plan since the Participatory PPA in 2007, expanding democracy in planning in all indicators of the intensity of democracy, and, therefore, achieving unprecedented levels of resignification. The demonstration on the graph called "The Democracy Cube" (FUNG, 2006) indicates a moderate position in the institutional possibilities for the viability of deliberation-participation. The work argues that the strategies adopted by the technical core of the Planning Secretariat of Bahia sought a balance between the democratization and the technical quality of planning, adding the positive features of both the plurality of interests of territories and the government expertise. Some considerations on the adoption of deliberation-participation by the government contributed to reveal a critique on the model adopted.